SUMMARY- with the photographer
The photographer’s studio was made
up of two rooms. One room was used as a waiting room and other room was used
for taking photographs. The photographers had kept various ladies and children magazines
of old times like “Ladies Companion for 1912, the girls’ Magazine for 1902 and
the Infants’ Journal for 1888 in a waiting room. In the inner room there was a frosted window.
A sheet of factory cotton hung against it and a beam of sunlight filtered
through it. In this room there was a machine that could be rolled. In this way,
the photographer had arranged his studio.
Once the
author went to a photographer. He wanted to his photograph taken. The author
had to wait an hour. When the author was looked down by the photographer, the
photographer said that his face is
quite wrong. At that time, the author accepted that he knew that his
face was wrong. He added that it would look better if it was three quarters
full. He also discussed about various types of faces found in the world.
The photographer wanted to take the
best photograph and wanted to prove his skill. He took the author’s head in his
hands and twisted it sideways and looked at it. He didn’t like the author’s
head. He asked to open the mouth and then to close it. He felt that the
author’s ears were bad so he asked him to drop them a little more. He asked the
author to roll his eyes under the eyelids, to put the hands on knees, to turn
the face little upward, to expand the lungs, to bend the neck, to contract the
face. By all the means he wanted the best feature and expression of the author
so he took much time in all type of arranging suggestions and criticism.
The photographer was continuously
criticizing the author’s face as he felt that the face was not appropriate for
a photograph. The author felt humiliated at this. He couldn’t bear he insult
anymore, as his face was his own only. He had lived with it for forty years and
he knew its faults. Though it was not beautiful and wasn’t made for him, it was
his face- the only one that the author had. Thus because of humiliation and
insult of his face, the author was angry with the photographer.
Because of
humiliation and insult of his face, the author was angry with the photographer.
As the author started to rise from the seat, the photographer took his
photograph. At that time the photographer looked pleased as he had caught the
features just in a moment of animation. He was also happy because he could take
the photograph of the ugly face of the author.
On Saturday, the author went back to
the photographer for his photograph. The photographer showed his photo. Looking
at it the author was surprised as the photographer made so many changes in his
eyes, eyebrow, mouth etc. He removed the eyebrows and he had retouched the
eyes. The photograph didn’t look like the auther’s photo at all. So the author
asked “is it me? When he saw the photograph.
The photographer was
a strange kind of person. He made so many changes in the photograph of the author’s
face that it did not look like his own. He removed the eyebrows and he had
retouched the eyes.
The photographer was a strange kind
of person. He made so many changes in the photograph of the author’s face that
it did not look like his own. He removed the eyebrows and had retouched the
eyes. He adjusted a little the author’s mouth as it was too law according to
him.
The photographer was a strange kind
of person. He made so many changes in the photograph of the author’s face that
it did not look like his own. He wanted to fix ears all right in the print.
There was a process then for removing the ears entirely.
The author
wanted a photograph that would have looked like himself. He wanted something
that would depict the face as God gave it to him. He wanted something that his
friends might have kept after his death to reconcile them to his loss. But what
the author wanted was no done at all. The photographer had almost changed
author’s eyes, eyebrow, mouth etc. The photograph never looked like the
author’s face. The purpose of the photograph was wasted the man in the
photograph was quite different than himself.
Nice post.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your articles that you have shared with us. Hopefully you can give the article a good benefit to us. Photographer
ReplyDeleteThank you for your important summary
ReplyDeleteThe photographer’s obsession with "fixing" features humorously highlights the disconnect between natural beauty and artificial perfection.
ReplyDeleteladder tray hyderabad
heavy duty pallet racking system hyderabad
The author’s frustration with the over-edited photograph is relatable; sometimes, we just want authenticity!
ReplyDeleteheavy duty industrial storage racks hyderabad
cable ladder raceway malanpur
This story perfectly captures the timeless conflict between the client’s vision and the artist’s interpretation.
ReplyDeleteprefab storage sheds bengaluru
heavy duty racking system hyderabad
It’s amusing how the photographer’s insistence on “improving” the face completely undermined the author’s individuality.
ReplyDeleteheavy duty pallet racks bengaluru
mobile compactor bengaluru
It’s ironic how the photographer believed he was enhancing the photo, but instead, he erased its authenticity.
ReplyDeleteRacking system delhi
Industrial Mezzanine Floor Delhi
The author’s desire for a photo that his friends could cherish posthumously speaks volumes about how we value legacy.
ReplyDeleteHeavy Duty Rack delhi
Mobile Compactor delhi
This humorous yet poignant tale reminds us that beauty is subjective, and personal identity is priceless.
ReplyDeleteFile Compactor Storage System in Delhi
Dust collector manufacturer